Web Design Critique #3: Firefly

by on 9th June 2010 with 9 Comments

Our web design critiques have been a hit both with customers and commenters. Keep up the great work providing quality ideas and suggestions!

Today’s site is Firefly, the home page of a social work recruitment agency based in the UK.

If you’d like to submit your website to be featured in a future Design Critique, it just takes a few minutes. We charge $24 for critiquing your design – considerably less than you’d pay for a consultant to take a look at your site! You can find out more here.

Firefly

By their own definition, “Firefly is a recruitment consultancy that specialises in sourcing, placing and managing social work professionals in public and private sector roles throughout London and its neighbouring counties. Our approach to recruitment is personal and consultative.”

Here’s the home page of their website:

screenshot

Overall, the site design is really nice and I have I have a lot of good things to say about it. Let’s look at a few of these in-depth.

Color Scheme

First of all, I really like the color palette at work here. It uses all light colors that are easy on the eyes and look beautiful together.

screenshot

The boldest color here is the green and the designer used it in perfect amounts. It’s scattered fairly heavily over the top of the site, only in key places throughout the content, and makes a big appearance as the main color of the footer (in three variations!).

Attention to Detail

There are lots of little bits of design scattered throughout the page that are just nice touches. It shows the designer was taking the time to go slow and get the interface right instead of rushing just to get something published.

screenshot

Repetition

Repetition is one of the key aspects of a design and a principle that is either misunderstood or completely unknown to many web designers. This designer used it masterfully not only through the repetition of the green as mentioned above but also through the use of the circle element from the logo.

screenshot

Repeating an element across a page like this makes the design seem more cohesive. It also gives the eye something familiar to spot as it browses the page.

Layout

The designer chose to implement a three column layout and stuck with it the entire length of the site. The alignments are strong and the columns are executed very well. The visual separation of the far right column through the use of a darker background color is an excellent touch as it helps highlight the main content and break up the monotony of a large white page.

Things to Improve

Overall, the design is one of the strongest we’ve seen yet for a critique. However, there are a few small adjustments that could be made.

Image Resolution

Because I have a background in print, I tend to be a resolution nazi. The logo at the top left not only represents the brand of the company, it’s also one of the first things a user sees when landing on the page. For this reason, you want to make sure it’s nice a crisp.

I’ve blown up the logo a little to show you what I mean. This admittedly makes the problem even worse but it’s a good illustration of what to look for on a smaller level when saving images.

screenshot

Watch closely for image artifacting and degradation. This logo is fairly small and shouldn’t bog down the site if it were to be saved at a higher resolution.

Text Heavy

Perhaps the worse visual problem with this page is that it’s just so text heavy. It’s simply a lot of information to throw at someone when they first land on your site. This much reading can be time consuming and intimidating and can actually lead to the user ignoring the text altogether.

I’d consider trimming this down to the bare necessities and placing any non-crucial information on a supporting page rather than giving it prominence here.

Usability

There’s a slight usability problem with some of the text on the page. I’m not sure what’s causing it, but in Safari the text in the Welcome column isn’t selectable.

I know it sounds picky but the entire point of having live text is so you have clean, crisp, and fully-selectable (and therefore copy paste-able) copy on the page.

I recommend taking a look at your code to see what’s causing this error.

Two Paperclips

As I stated above, repetition is a good thing in design. However, as I also pointed out, it’s often misunderstood or misused. The paperclip is a nice graphical element and would’ve been great to repeat somewhere else on the page, but putting two of them this close to each other makes this section suffer from a Photoshop clone syndrome.

screenshot

I think using just one paperclip here would make a stronger statement. If you really want to stick with two, make sure that they aren’t identical. Rotate one or flip it around to provide a little variation.

Your Turn!

Now that you’ve read my comments, pitch in and help out by giving the designer some further advice. Let us know what you think is great about the design and what you think could be stronger. As always, we ask that you also be respectful of the site’s designer and offer clear constructive advice devoid of any harsh insults.

Interested in having your own site critiqued? You can find out more here.

Comments & Discussion

9 Comments

  • http://www.webcertain.com Bryan Sutton

    Test Heavy?

    I don’t think so, from an SE) point of view the less text, content, links, bullet points the less ranking in Search engines. I think this is very good use of text layout.

    I would rather have less text but seo needs say otherwise, so has designers we have to make the best of what is available to us.

    Very good web site

    But has a recruitment website i would of made the Vacancies more eye catching and not so hidden grey on grey

  • http://www.stevensst.com Freelance Web Designer

    In my opinion, the navigation menu can also make use of some hover effects.

  • http://www.digitalpuffin.com Sean

    Overall, a very nice clean design.
    I would agree, that for a home page, it is text heavy. I know everyone has different opinions on SEO practices, I tend to stay on the side of good design over making Google happier. The text is just too overwhelming and I know I wouldn’t take the time to read any of it. If it were a smaller amount of text, I’d be more inclined to take the time to read it.
    I’m also not a fan of the paperclips. Paperclips in my opinion are a ‘hand-made’ design, not a corporate site. I’d recommend only one if you absolutely want them in there.

    My only other critique is the photo itself. I’m just really tired of stock photography and I feel it makes a huge difference to have a good solid ‘real’ photo in there. Even if it means paying a real photographer for one of his photos, I think it pays off in the end.

  • http://laira.pathseek.info/ Laira

    Awesome work .Thanks for the posting…

  • http://www.goldenboymedia.co.uk Daniel Pereira

    Thanks for publishing our site Joshua. Alot of effort was spent in getting the right feel for the client.

    Will def look into the ‘things to improve’ section to try get reach the site’s potential.

    Thanks again

  • http://www.thepixeldreams.com anilnavis

    Its a very clean design. One small mistake, text character “V” is coming before the image slide show.

  • Joshua Johnson

    Anilnavis, good catch, I didn’t notice that!

  • http://www.xhtmlspruce.com xhtmlspruce

    Really it is awesome work.. Thanks for sharing.. :)

  • Shawn

    I have seen Daniel develop into a quite formidable designer over the years. This is just the latest in ever-improving work.

    Perfect “design for the times” that makes many conflicting aspects (such as being text heavy vs clean layout) work well together.

Subscribe
Membership
About the Author