Web Design Critique #4: Anthem Design Group

by on 16th June 2010 with 12 Comments

Every week we take a look at a new website and analyze the design. We’ll point out both the areas that are done well and those that could use some work. Finally, we’ll finish by asking you to provide your own feedback.

Today’s site is Anthem Design Group. Anthem is a small award-winning creative and interactive design agency located in Atlanta, Georgia USA

If you’d like to submit your website to be featured in a future Design Critique, it just takes a few minutes. We charge $24 for critiquing your design – considerably less than you’d pay for a consultant to take a look at your site! You can find out more here.

Anthem

“We are a friendly, hard-working group of creative and technical people with super-high standards that love making awesome websites, apps, games, and art. Our work is award-winning, attractive and finely-crafted. We love to work with any size business, and are proud of our diverse and fantastic group of clients.”

Here’s the home page of their website:

screenshot

It’s a fairly strong design with three primary columns plus a sidebar (so basically four columns). The large image up top is an image slider with a basic fading transition.

Let’s examine a couple of the things that are really nice about this design.

Easy to Navigate

There’s a lot going on here for a single page, but for the most part it’s laid out logically and is easy to sort through. The homepage seems to serve as a nice overview of everything you’ll find on the site. Several of the pages accessible through the navigation are represented here on the page with a little bit of content.

Any time you’re clueless as to how to fill the homepage of a large site, remember that it should often serve as a gateway to everything else. Inserting bite-sized previews of the rest of the site here allows the user to quickly become acquainted with what you’re offering and will also serve to aid the process of finding specific content.

Breaking the Lines

This site has some fairly strict alignments and containment devices that are good for keeping everything clean and organized. However, we see in the footer that it’s often good to take a design like this and break it in a few places.

screenshot

Here we see the logo and contact information placed into a box that violates the harsh lines setup by the footer and content separation. I’d like to see something at the top of the page pick up this idea as well to ease the rigidness of the design.

Areas to Improve

Now let’s dive into the critique. Below are a few issues I personally believe should be addressed regarding the design.

Interactive?

I see the word “interactive” in several places on the page regarding what Anthem does, but aside from the image slider, the site simply doesn’t feel very interactive. One of the key areas I think is suffering is the link hover effects, or lack thereof.

In the navigation, the difference in the color of the link on the non-hover and hover states is a bit too subtle and perhaps impossible for colorblind users to even notice on such small text. Further, aside from those in the sidebar, nearly all the other links on the page have absolutely no hover effect at all. If your browser’s cursor didn’t automatically change for links, users probably wouldn’t even know there were any present on the page.

Again, this ties closely in with the notion of “interactive.” Adding items that change with interaction at various points throughout the page will make the site feel much more alive and active. These elements don’t have to scream at your users, but they should at least not be hidden.

Adding Links

Along the same vein as bringing the current links to life, I think a few more should be added. As I said before, I like how the home page content and navigation tie together. For instance, there is a services link in the navigation, and a services section on the page. However, the text that says “Services and Capabilities” in the content section isn’t enabled as a link to the “Services and Capabilities” page.

Always seek to make things ridiculously easy on your users. If they see a headline that matches the place they want to go, they should be able to click it to go there rather than hunting around for the right link.

Spacing

There are a couple of places on the page that split the content up into three columns, each with their own header. The problem is that the header and the column are spaced so far apart, it’s not immediately apparent that they belong together.

screenshot

I recommend removing about half of the spacing here so that users can instantly tell that these two areas should be interpreted as a single unit.

Alignment & Overflow

There are two key areas where I’m spotting issues with small items not lining up properly. The first is in the sidebar. The Twitter feed here seems to be overflowing out of the containment box.

screenshot

The second is the legal copy and navigation links in the footer. They don’t really share any sort of an alignment and appear to just be floating randomly in the space. I recommend giving them both a strong left alignment and perhaps pushing them over near the logo area on the left.

Your Turn!

Now that you’ve read my comments, pitch in and help out by giving the designer some further advice. Let us know what you think is great about the design and what you think could be stronger. As always, we ask that you also be respectful of the site’s designer and offer clear constructive advice devoid of any harsh insults.

Interested in having your own site critiqued? You can find out more here.

Comments & Discussion

12 Comments

  • http://www.crazylarsens.com Jamie Larsen

    I agree with the critique that you made on the website. There is one other one that i feel is pretty important.

    The links on the page are different colors from each other and a lot of them are the same color as the regular copy (mostly in the right column). You don’t want to make people work on your site to find what they want. Be consistent in the color and make the links look like a link.

    Regarding the spacing in the main column area (services & capabilities). I completely agree. There is too much space within the same area but I think that there isn’t enough space in between the different areas. For example, the our work and the services and capabilities need to have more spacing between them.

  • Serena

    I agree with your comments, but in all honestly, these “issues” are very minor. When you critique a website, what you really need to look for is what’s effecting or interfering with conversion. Little spacing or alignment issues isn’t going to hurt performance unless it effects usability. You can have the most beautiful, perfectly designed website in the world – and it doesn’t meet your goals (in the case we call this “over-designing”). When critiquing sites, tried to find the areas that will INCREASE CONVERSIONS, reduce bounce rates, etc. That is what’s most important.

  • Joshua Johnson

    Hiding links IS interfering with conversion, wouldn’t you agree?

  • Pingback: CSS Brigit | Web Design Critique #4: Anthem Design Group

  • Brian Jones

    Overall – not a bad design. My only confusion however is the footer links and copywright information. Being a design firm , I would think this would be cleaned up a bit. The copywright information is shifted and all 3 elements should be to the right more – or more centered. Looks a mess IMO

  • http://cuddleuptoflash.com Shawn Borsky

    Thanks Josh, some great points.
    We will be listening intently at all the comments.

  • http://www.williamastrom.se William Astrom

    I would like to see some more spacing between the logo in the header and the slider. Seems there is more space above them below the logo.

    And as you say there is quite a lot of space where Websites/design/apps section is. But directly below Our work/Services & Capabilities/About Anthem i think its too cramped.

    I believe the design would gain a lot by going over these areas a little.

    Otherwise it is a neat site design!

    Best Regards,
    William

  • http://www.fxmemo.com/ memo

    Some very insightful comments indeed.
    Learnt a lot!

  • Tim Jarvis

    Good critique!!

    The one thing I would say is that putting people’s faces on a webpage can help or hinder a user.

    Humans recognise other humans automatically and in most cases will look at the human’s face first. Then they follow the eyes (to see what they are looking at), like in this case the eyes look at you you end up staring straight at the figure.

    If the eyes looked towards the main call to action Users would find it quicker.

    Just a thought

  • Dale Price

    One big thing I noticed is that the contact information at the bottom is an image, rather than actual web text. That’s inconvenient for someone who, say, is using a smartphone and just wants to click the phone number to call it. It’s also bad for accessibility, since it doesn’t respect a user’s browser setting for minimum font size or allow a text-to-speech program to read it.

    Another thing: on the contact page, there are tabs for Business Inquiries and Questions. These are unclear – they don’t really look like tabs (just random boxes with links in them), and it’s unclear which one is selected (does gray mean active or inactive?).

    This could be improved by moving them closer to the form (they’re randomly off in the distance right now), so users will realize they go with the form.
    Also, it would be clearer which one is selected if you remove the bottom border from the selected one, thus associating it with the currently shown form content.

  • Ricardo

    Hi there, I think the image slider navigation should be more explicit (). When you enter the page if you get an image with a white background you cant notice the navigation buttons when mouse hover.
    When you get the images from Trip Mobile or Theresa you cant see the navigation.

  • Stefan

    In response to Serena’s comment:

    You sound like a marketing exec with no experience in the field of design.

    When critiquing the DESIGN of a website, sloppiness and bad margins are absolutely not “very minor” issues. Go to any serious design firm in the world, try to tell them that sloppy inconsistency & bad margins are unimportant problems, and you will be laughed at.

    When you’re talking about conversion and bounce rate, you’re talking about issues with CONTENT much more than with DESIGN. Design principles and concepts apply across the board.

    This critique was spot on. Props!

Subscribe
Membership
About the Author