Web Design Critique #7: Web Icon Set

by on 9th July 2010 with 7 Comments

Every week we take a look at a new website and analyze the design. We’ll point out both the areas that are done well as well as those that could use some work. Finally, we’ll finish by asking you to provide your own feedback.

Today’s site is Web Icon Set, a web design inspiration gallery.

If you’d like to submit your website to be featured in a future Design Critique, it just takes a few minutes. We charge $24 for critiquing your design – considerably less than you’d pay for a consultant to take a look at your site! You can find out more here.

Web Icon Set

The site seems like it is still in the early stages of its launch period but it already has a few really nice looking icon sets free to download and use in your next project.

Here’s the home page of the site:

screenshot

The Good

Let’s start off by looking at the portions of the site that were designed really well. It’s definitely an attractive start so there are plenty of style points to hand out.

The Icons

screenshot

This site is all about icons so the most important question is: are they any good? The answer is yes. The icons are thoughtfully designed, meaning they’re actually useful to designers, and they look great too. Right now there are only a few sets available but I look forward to seeing more added in the future.

The Navigation

screenshot

I like the 3D wrap around effect on the navigation bar as well as the subtle letterpress effect on the subcopy for each item. When you hover over an area, the text turns blue so you definitely know these are links. It would be nice to see this area stand out a bit more but overall I like the direction here.

The Sidebar

screenshot

The sidebar is a nice quick reference for the available icons. This will really come in handy when the site has more icon sets to browse through. The graphical previews here are bright and colorful and really grab your attention as you’re browsing the contents of the page.

Areas to Improve

Now that we’ve see a couple of the areas that work well, I’ll point out a few ideas that I have for improving the overall experience and design of the site.

Typography

screenshot

I think the mixture of font styles on the site is clashing. The big odd one out is the sort of cliche 90s brush script used in the logo for the site. If only one thing gets changed on this site, I recommend that it be this. If you’re looking for some quality free fonts, try FontSquirrel and resist the temptation to choose the craziest font you can find. There are plenty of really nice and highly readable options that still provide you with a unique look.

Background Graphic

screenshot

I don’t mind the swooshy rainbow thing going on in the header but I think it ends far too abruptly. I recommend just continuing the graphic and curving it out the top of the site or at least giving it a much more gradual fade out. The harsh cutoff has a quick fix feel to it and feels a little like seeing duct tape on a leaky pipe.

Grammar and Spelling

screenshot

I’m no English professor so I usually avoid pointing out issues like this lest you all start attacking my sentence structure. However, the site really is suffering from the clunky wording on a few of the copy points. For instance, “We regularly adding more great icons!” should be changed to something like “We’ll be regularly adding more great icons!”

Further, the logo states “Provide you with the best professional and quality icon sets.” This could be tweaked to read “Providing you with the best professional quality icon sets.”

Finally, there are several typos in the keywords for each icon set: “inclides” instead of “includes,” “Porducts” instead of “products,” etc.

Your Turn!

Now that you’ve read my comments, pitch in and help out by giving the designer some further advice. Let us know what you think is great about the design and what you think could be stronger. As always, we ask that you also be respectful of the site’s designer and offer clear constructive advice devoid of any harsh insults.

Interested in having your own site critiqued? You can find out more here.

Comments & Discussion

7 Comments

  • http://www.newschoolmagazine.com Erik Kubitschek

    I totally agree that the header bg is cool, yet needs to either fade slower or just run all the way.
    The logo font(s) suggestions are excellent.

    The logo itself seems aesthetically misplaced. The logo is cool, the textured bg is cool, but together…they don’t jive well.
    I, personally, would drop the bg all together and start over with some glossy stuff (assuming it’s easier to change the bg than the logo.

  • http://liamhammett.me/ Liam Hammett

    I have to agree with you on this. I checked out the site earlier in the week, and I thought it had a nice clean design showing the content well. I did think that the logo font should have been changed, and a few grammar fixes, but my guess is that English is their second language, and they’ve not worked too much with typography on websites.

    Still, great critique review ;)

  • Pingback: CSS Brigit | Web Design Critique #7: Web Icon Set

  • http://www.crearedesign.co.uk Laura Meider

    After seeing this website for the first time I do agree with the comments made on the header graphic, it is bold and works well. However, I think that this could be made more of and be extended across the background as this will draw the users attention into the centre of the website. The edges of this rainbow effect do finish quite sharply and maybe a little to close to the main centre container, blending lots of areas into one when these should appear more separate.

    I agree with the comments on the navigation, I do really like the blue hover, it really ties in well with the colour scheme. It would be nice to see a little more of this colour on more menu headings as I think it really lifts the site. I would possibly make the grey sub copy only slightly darker as I feel that this hard to read.

    I find the About WebIconSet.com container on the site also hard to read but I think this is down to using a serif font and also being italic. I agree with the typography, with the modern graphic at the top of the page I think it will look great with more of a modern font. I would suggest that if the ‘Web Icon Set’ is used as a script then the copy underneath would work best done in an opposite style and use a sans serif font to offset the design and make it look really clean.

    The downloadable options are very clean and simple, clearly showing the user what they are. Overall the website is very clean and is not complicated, it is great seeing that a simple graphic can work so well on a website. The white space is great!

  • http://www.crazylarsens.com Jamie Larsen

    I agree that the site is nice… So instead of pointing out the nice things of the site, I am going to point out a couple of improvements that I would recommend (that have not been mentioned yet).

    Most of the website design elements are at the top of the page with the logo, rainbow, and navigation. I would recommend bringing some more to the footer area to tie it all together. Maybe finishing off the side borders, some rainbow colors, footer navigation, etc…

    It would be nice to see the text under each of the navigation links change on hover as well. That way you can see what it says better.

    Last, I would make sure that there is an active state on the navigation. Right now when you click on a page, you don’t know where you are in the top. They are all still black links.

  • Joshua Johnson

    Thanks for the input guys!

  • mikis

    Can you rate essay service from Ukraine?

    Dominatorgtx92 Student Jul 17, 12, 04:37AM | #1
    Joined: Jul 17, 12
    Threads: 1
    Posts: 2

    My friends found a site dedicated to the essay.

    Who can recommend a more sites?

    Who can rate this website, it is a good service or bad?

    Really need your help! THX
    oceanblue Student Jul 17, 12, 06:02AM | #2
    Joined: May 17, 11
    Threads: 1
    Posts: 12

    Never heard of it.
    mre Jul 17, 12, 08:13AM | #3
    Joined: Jul 14, 08
    Threads: 1
    Posts: 180

    They are bad and frauds.
    Dominatorgtx92 Student Jul 17, 12, 09:07AM | #4
    Joined: Jul 17, 12
    Threads: 1
    Posts: 2

    It USA service……
    MeoKhan Writer Jul 17, 12, 09:43AM | #5
    Joined: Jan 9, 11
    Threads: 5
    Posts: 1,355

    On the WHOIS record, the company seems to be based in the US. However, this information can be very misleading. So, nobody can say where this company is “actually” located.
    mre Jul 17, 12, 01:38PM | #6
    Joined: Jul 14, 08
    Threads: 1
    Posts: 180

    Dominatorgtx92:
    It USA service……

    Did you not ask for my opinion? Why are you asking for other opinions when it seems as though you know more about the company than other posters? It actually seems as though you represent the company. Would I be correct in that assumption?

    They are frauds.

Subscribe
Membership
About the Author