<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Shack &#187; analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designshack.net/tag/analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designshack.net</link>
	<description>Inspiration, CSS Gallery &#38; Community News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Design Critique: Blog Platforms</title>
		<link>http://designshack.net/articles/design-critique-blog-platforms/</link>
		<comments>http://designshack.net/articles/design-critique-blog-platforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Appleyard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platforms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most designers are familiar with the relative pros and cons of different publishing tools &#8211; but what about the websites of the blog platforms themselves? We all know that you shouldn&#8217;t judge a book by its cover, but I would argue that there&#8217;s no harm in looking&#8230; We&#8217;re going to take a look at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/blogplatforms.jpg" alt="Blog Platform Design Comparison" class="right" /></p>
<p>Most designers are familiar with the relative pros and cons of different publishing tools &#8211; but what about the websites of the blog platforms themselves? We all know that you shouldn&#8217;t judge a book by its cover, but I would argue that there&#8217;s no harm in looking&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to take a look at the homepage for four popular platforms: WordPress, Textpattern, ExpressionEngine and Blogger. Which ones are beautiful enough to compel you to use their platform, and which ones have the design aesthetic of a <a href="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/hellokittytoaster.jpg" target="_blank">hello kitty toaster</a>? Hopefully through a critique of these designs you can take home some good pointers for use in your own work.</p>
<h2>WordPress</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.wordpress.org"><img src="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/analysis_blog_wordpress.jpg" alt="WordPress Blog Design" border="0" class="border" /></a></p>
<p>The WordPress homepage has recently gone through a complete re-design for the release of version 2.5 of the software. Whilst the site does have a huge amount of content, the homepage is simple and easy to read.</p>
<p><b>What works:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The use of orange to highlight download links makes the task that most people visit the site for a simple one</li>
<li>The style of language &#8211; &#8220;WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time&#8221; is a great sentence.</li>
<li>It makes WordPress understandable to someone who has very little knowledge of technical aspects. The words PHP and MySQL are not even mentioned!</li>
<li>Form input fields have been painstakingly designed</li>
</ul>
<p><b>What doesn&#8217;t work:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The WordPress for Dummies image in the bottom corner clashes with the colour scheme</li>
<li>The fact that the site ironically doesn&#8217;t seem to be powered by WordPress</li>
</ul>
<h2>Textpattern</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.textpattern.com"><img src="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/analysis_blog_textpattern.jpg" alt="Textpattern Blog Design" border="0" class="border" /></a></p>
<p>Textpattern is the most basic of designs and does not go a very long way to &#8216;selling&#8217; itself to potential users. However, with all the focus being placed on textual content it does live up to it&#8217;s name. We use Textpattern to publish certain sections of Design Shack and we&#8217;re more than happy with it!</p>
<p><b>What works:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Splitting the layout using only text columns screams professionalism</li>
<li>A subtle use of yellow defines the Textpattern &#8216;brand&#8217;</li>
<li>The requirements and interface features are quickly found</li>
</ul>
<p><b>What doesn&#8217;t work:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The site is focused towards the technically minded</li>
<li>There is no emphasized area of text which introduces the software</li>
<li>Screenshots are displayed in a fairly flat and uninteresting manner</li>
<li>The download link is tricky to see</li>
<li>The amount of content on the page is excessive, overloading visitors a little too quickly</li>
</ul>
<h2>Blogger</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.blogger.com"><img src="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/analysis_blog_blogger.jpg" alt="Blogger Blog Design" border="0" class="border" /></a></p>
<p>Blogger differs from the other platforms we are analysing as it is a hosted service. Powered by Google, it allows completely non-technically minded people to start publishing a blog with great ease.</p>
<p><b>What works:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Content is kept simple with a minimum of technical information</li>
<li>The &#8217;3 easy steps&#8217; idea easily guides the user through a straight forward process</li>
<li>Branding is used well, imprinting the Blogger logo on the readers mind</li>
</ul>
<p><b>What doesn&#8217;t work:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The use of typography is confused, with too many different effects, colours and faces</li>
<li>The site lacks professionalism, clearly focused towards a certain user group</li>
<li>The icons look decidedly dated</li>
<li>Tables are used for layout in certain areas which really should be styled with CSS</li>
</ul>
<h2>Expression Engine</h2>
<p><a href="http://expressionengine.com/"><img src="http://www.designshack.net/postimages/analysis_blog_expressionengine.jpg" alt="Expression Engine Blog Design" border="0" class="border" /></a></p>
<p>As the only commercially sold platform in this analysis, Expression Engine has a different motive to persuade publishers to use their software. This leads to a design more reminiscent of other commercial software sites.</p>
<p><b>What works:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>A professional, well designed colour scheme</li>
<li>The use of tabbed content on the homepage to show a greater amount of information in a visually appealing way</li>
<li>The website is powered by Expression Engine itself</li>
<li>Unlike Blogger, the icons and graphics used and professional and well crafted</li>
</ul>
<p><b>What doesn&#8217;t work:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The bold logo for the testimonial section immediately draws the eye &#8211; away from the main Expression Engine logo</li>
<li>Due to the heavy graphical nature of the page, loading time is slightly longer than the other designs</li>
</ul>
<h2>Lessons to take away</h2>
<ul>
<li><i>From WordPress:</i> Place emphasis on the most important reason the user came to the site, in this case, to download the software</li>
<li><i>From Textpattern:</i> Too much information can overload the reader, and a brand can be created using a single line of colour</li>
<li><i>From Blogger:</i> Guide the user through a process</li>
<li><i>From Expression Engine:</i> Using a dynamic area can allow more information to be conveyed without overloading the user at first</li>
</ul>
<p>We hope you enjoyed this &#8220;design analysis&#8221; concept and found it to be useful. Please feel free to give your two cents on the above designs in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designshack.net/articles/design-critique-blog-platforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 203/225 objects using disk: basic

Served from: designshack.net @ 2012-02-09 18:19:30 -->
