Designing on a Retina Screen: My Thoughts on the Retina MacBook Pro

by on 9th July 2012 with 37 Comments

screenshot

220.5 pixels per inch: 2,800 wide and 1,800 tall for a total of over five million pixels. That’s the screen that I work on now, full time. This gives rise to tons of questions: does Apple have any business making such a screen? Will it help or hinder the industry? Can you really do design work on that thing if you’re designing for non-retina screens?

Today I’m going to tell you all about my experience with the machine that threatens to change the way you do your job. I’ll hold nothing back as I rave about what I love and rant about what drives me nuts. Read along and see if you agree with my conclusions.

Dang You Apple

For the past decade, we designers have been focused on how to tackle a major paradigm shift in the form of ever varying screen sizes. This challenge has stretched us to our wit’s end but brought us out the other side better designers, capable of achieving impressive feats of truly flexible websites that look great on any size screen.

screenshot

Mediaqueri.es showcases responsive web design that looks great anywhere.

While we had our attention focused on one major paradigm shift though, another snuck up on us: resolution. The momentum behind this shift has recently come from Apple with its “retina” quality displays, now present on the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad and MacBook Pro, with the iMac and MacBook Air no doubt to follow some time in the next year or two.

Apple may not be the first or only electronics manufacturer to push high resolution displays, nor are they almost ever the first to anything. However, like it or not, they have historically set the mark for widespread adoption of major technology shifts (this is the part where you skip everything else that I say so you can rant about how much this isn’t true in the comments).

screenshot

As with the screen size revolution, this presents designers with a huge paradigm shift that changes everything. This hurdle may prove to be even more difficult to overcome than the last and it requires our immediate attention and speculation. Back in March, I posted a discussion on this very topic.

Since then I’ve purchased a Retina MacBook Pro, the machine that broke the retina display out of its nice little iOS walled garden and into the realm of something that people of all types of professions will use for work. After weeks of working on the machine full time, I thought it would be appropriate to share my experiences with you.

Should Retina Screens Even Exist?

“As we see high density screens get larger and larger I start to question, why? Just because we can?” – John Carey
Fifty Foot Shadows

I’ve read several articles lately from creatives who are actually quite angry with Apple for pushing the industry down such a troublesome path. Like Ian Malcom castigating John Hammond for his hasty decision to bring dinosaurs back from the dead, these critics insist that just because Apple can make such a screen, doesn’t mean that they should.

One day with the retina screen convinced me that the critics are wrong. It’s just so dang beautiful. I can barely stand to look at my old MacBook any more. My eyes have been opened and suddenly the same screen that I never had an issue with looks downright dark and muddy.

Should We Have Stopped at the VCR?

The only way to really appreciate what this is like without experiencing it for yourself is to find an old CRT television and hook it up to a VCR so you can watch a movie. Seriously, go try it. Within seconds you’ll wonder how in the world you ever managed to endure such a poor visual experience. Ten minutes of this and you’ll be thanking the technology gods daily for the almighty Blu-ray.

screenshot

It was a pain to switch from VHS tapes, but looking back now, it was worth it.

With the perspective that we have now, looking back, both the customers and the producers in the movie industry are better off for having left behind the VHS tape as the primary method of video reproduction and distribution. Was the revolution inconvenient to everyone involved? Absolutely.

Content creators had to learn, adopt and even develop brand new ways of doing things. Customers had to abandon old equipment and loads of content, make new purchases that seemed redundant with previous ones, learn new jargon; it was a mess. And that only got them to the DVD stage, many are still in the midst of jumping to either Blu-ray or perhaps even a purely digital solution such as iTunes and the Apple TV.

“Advances are not based on whether or not they will inconvenience anyone. Especially when Apple is in the driver’s seat.”

The arrival of high resolution computing presents the same problems, both for consumers and content creators alike. Unfortunately, that’s how the technology industry works. Advances are made when there’s a market for them and the technological know how is present to produce a quality result that consumers can afford. They are not based on whether or not they will inconvenience anyone. Especially when Apple is in the driver’s seat.

And that’s a good thing. Sure, it may not seem like it, but keep in mind that once upon a time computer monitors only possessed a handful of colors and you can bet that there were people in the industry at the time that insisted that they go no further. I’m sure you’re glad they they did, so stop being one of the people who are dragged kicking and screaming into progress and instead try attacking challenges head on and contributing something valuable to the conversation.

Living and Working On a Retina MacBook Pro

“I knew there would be some troubles, and there are.”

Whether or not retina screens should exist in the mainstream market is really an irrelevant discussion. They do, and you have two choices: adapt or die. As a former print-only designer I faced this choice, Flash developers are currently facing this choice, you might as well join the club.

I’m all about adaptation so I took the early adopter route and jumped on this train before having any idea where it was going. I left behind my 2007 13″ MacBook and bought a shiny new, 15″ Retina MacBook Pro.

I knew there would be some troubles, and there are. Some of those that I was worried about turned out to be no big deal, others that I didn’t count on snuck up and have plagued me to frustration.

A Thousand Hats

On any given day, I wear several metaphorical hats. I’m a designer, writer, photographer, web browser, movie watcher; you name it.

Because of this I can offer insight into a lot of different experiences from a retina display standpoint. The one thing I’m admittedly not is a gamer. I grew up attached to a Nintendo controller and never had an interest in PC gaming so you’ll have to ask elsewhere if you’re looking for insight in that area.

Here’s a look at some main categories of daily use and my thoughts on each.

General OS Use

I’m currently running OS X Lion and it seems 99% updated for retina graphics. Every now and then I catch site of a button that looks pixelated, but only in deeply buried utilities that few even use anyway.

For the most part, this is where the display shines. Everything looks absolutely stunning. Apple has not only updated the core system but most of its apps as well such as iMovie.

Third Party Apps

This area was a concern when I purchased the machine, but it has turned out to be a less significant issue that I thought it would be.

Many of my favorite apps, such as Sublime Text 2, looked rough at first but have already received retina updates that make them better than ever.

Granted, most apps haven’t updated yet but despite being an app-addict there really aren’t that many apps that I use on a daily basis. With the exclusion of CS6, which we’ll discuss later, the only app that I use every day that really bugs me is Twitter for Mac.

screenshot

This app really showcases the nastiness of non-retina graphics on a retina display. Interestingly enough, live, editable text like that which occurs in the “new tweet” window looks fine, but your entire stream is hideous, from text to avatars.

Web Browsing

“It’s the small images that look bad. The tiny JPG logo at the top of the website, the interface screenshot…”

Web browsing really had me scared. I knew full well that the web is a low resolution world and pointing a 15″ retina screen at it is like taking a magnifying glass to a photo with low DPI.

To my surprise, we did prepare ourselves for this revolution remarkably well, even if completely by accident. In our obsession with saving bandwidth by building web graphics without images, we were actually building a web that is infinitely scaleable.

Most UI these days is built with good old HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Throwing a retina display at these graphics only makes them look better! For the record, the same can certainly not be said of Flash sites.

The real problem of course lies with images. Interestingly enough, most of my web browsing goes by without a single scowl, and I’m a resolution nut.

Professional photographs especially tend to look great. Cruise over to Flickr or 500px and you’ll find the experience just as enjoyable as ever, perhaps even more so.

It’s the small images that look bad. The tiny JPG logo at the top of the website, the interface screenshot, these really don’t have much information to work with for pixel doubling and therefore come out looking pretty deplorable.

Movies and TV Shows

The Retina MacBook Pro scrapped its optical drive just like the MacBook Air, so I obviously haven’t had any experience with DVDs, but for the most part, videos are like images. The great look better and the bad look worse.

Digitally downloaded HD movies shine on the display while Netflix /Hulu live streaming looks noticeably jaggy. Fortunately, the distance at which I typically watch a show is much further back than where I work so any resolution issues usually aren’t as noticeable.

Photography

Because I shoot with a Canon 5D Mk II, my photos come out nice and large. They look great on the retina display and I haven’t had any issues with zooming in and editing fine detail. The only real issue is that the software (Photoshop & Lightroom) hasn’t been retina beautified yet, even in CS6.

Writing

From a pure writing standpoint, the retina screen is astoundingly good. Typography at 220 pixels per inch is a beautiful thing. I pull up Writeroom, switch to fullscreen mode, and and block out the world.

After a few hours, it’s easy to forget just how good type looks. However, within seconds of bringing up a text document on a low-res display all I see are pixels. Dirty, ugly pixels.

The type doesn’t just look good at arm’s length either. I can stick my face as close to the screen as my eyes can handle and the type still seems tack sharp.

screenshot

Typography is beautifully crisp on the retina screen.

Photoshop, Design and Screenshots

Now comes the part that you really want to hear about: how is Photoshop? Can you design on this thing?

iOS Designers Should Find It Useful

I’ll start by saying that I’m not an iOS designer. These guys have been forced to design retina graphics on non-retina screens until now and I imagine that they’re eager to make the switch.

I have the opposite problem: designing non-retina graphics on a retina screen. You might not expect it to be a pain, but to be honest, it really really is.

This is because you lose all concept of resolution when you’re in the lower ppi range. I might be able to ignore little jaggy images when I’m browsing, but when I’m in the creator’s chair, my brain examines every pixel.

Pixel Doubled Artwork Sucks

“In order to properly get a feel for whether or not the artwork is up to par, I have to take a look at it on my old screen.”

On the retina screen, everything that I create or import into Photoshop at a standard web resolution looks like crap. Even if I build something in vector, unless I’m willing to export it as an SVG, and most of the time that’s not an option (yet), it’s still going to get output to a tiny JPG or PNG that looks super pixelated because my screen attempts to double its resolution.

This presents lots of tricky problems, both when I’m working with my own artwork and that of others. For my own artwork, should I build it low-res? Doing so impairs my ability to judge its clarity. Or should I build it high-res and scale it down for outpur? I’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but Photoshop can really trash raster artwork when scaling.

It’s also an issue when I’m using artwork from someone else. If you’re a designer, then you probably commonly receive third party artwork that is crappy and pixelated. You’ll consequently either choose to demand better artwork skip using it altogether.

For me, this is much more difficult, because at first glance, it’s always going to look bad on the retina display unless it happens to be huge. In order to properly get a feel for whether or not the artwork is up to par, I have to take a look at it on my old screen.

Screenshots

“Suddenly, the screenshots that I take are double the size that I intended!”

Given the fact that I blog for a living, I think it’s safe to say that I take more screenshots than the average person. I’m always working with screenshots from an app interface or website and including them in posts.

The retina display hit me with a wicked curveball here. Suddenly, the screenshots that I take are double the size that I intended! When resized, UI screenshots, with their raster graphics and tiny text, really look nasty on any screen, so I always try to use them at 100% when possible.

With the retina screen, what used to be a 510 pixel wide screenshot (the standard Design Shack image size) is now 1,020 pixels wide. If I ignore retina users completely and pretend they don’t exist, logic says that I should serve up images that are 510px wide, which means that I have to manually resize them in Photoshop and put up with the fact that they look like they were just run over by a truck, particularly where rasterized text is concerned.

Mind you, they of course look worse to me than most users because, you guessed it, I’m on a retina screen.

Change Your Resolution Stupid

I’ve presented my screenshot dilemma to a few different people and they all say the same thing: just change your resolution! This seems like a perfectly viable solution, but it turns out it’s not that simple.

The Retina MacBook Pro comes with five different resoluion settings. Here’s what happens if I choose two different resolutions, take a screenshot of the same exact window, then stick them next to each other in Photoshop.

screenshot

As you can see, they come out the exact same size. Changing the resolution in System Preferences does affect the overall size of the total screenshot, but most of the time the elements within the screenshot come out unchanged.

For the record, here’s how much of that window I can fit into a 510px wide document at full size:

screenshot

If you just cursed, then your reaction was spot on with my own.

Working On a Bright, Sharp Screen

“Spending half the day jumping between a retina and non-retina screen literally made me feel sea sick!”

On my old MacBook, I typically worked at full brightness. I’ve read tons of stuff about battery life, eye strain and whatnot but I never liked the way it looked unless the brightness was cranked.

On this new screen, full brightness is absolutely too bright for most lighting scenarios. Retina screen? More like retina burning screen. This is great though, I’d much rather have a screen that’s too bright and needs to be turned down.

Interestingly enough, I’ve noticed some occasional headaches since switching. The screen is so bright and sharp, you’d think it be easier on the eyes but there might be a point where it goes too far and causes more eye strain than it saves. As long as I keep the brightness in check, I don’t think this will be a major issue long term.

The sharpness of the screen was really only an issue on day one, when I was transferring everything from the old machine to the new one. Spending half the day jumping between a retina and non-retina screen literally made me feel sea sick!

Growing Pains

“With new technology comes new challenges and early adopters like me are the ones who pay the price”

So there you have it, my full list of praise and complaints regarding my new Retina MacBook Pro. Intentionally, this article is focused on the challenges of working on a retina screen more than the benefits. If I’m being completely honest, the benefits blow me away and I’m not one little bit regretful of my purchase. I absolutely love this computer and won’t hesitate to say that it’s the best I’ve ever used.

All of the struggles that I’ve listed above are merely growing pains. With new technology comes new challenges and early adopters like me are the ones who pay the price (figuratively and literally) in exchange for owning shiny new toys that no one else has.

Years down the road, when all new computers are hitting 220ppi and have solid state drives as standard components, the price tag for this technology will be much more affordable and the penalties for using it nearly nonexistent.

screenshot

Computer screen resolution comparison from The Verge

Just about every complaint that I listed above really boils down to the fact that I own a computer with a higher resolution display than the people that I’m designing for. Once we’re all on the same page, everything will be dramatically simplified.

I will say though that owning a device with a retina quality screen can boost your sense of urgency for the image problem that we now face on the web. You want retina users to have beautiful images, but is it worth the load time hit for non-retina users? Fortunately, some really awesome solutions like Retina.js are starting to spring up that will ease this problem.

Still, a near future where we have to create and upload double the images that we used to isn’t exactly something to get excited about is it?

What Do You Think?

Hopefully, this huge rant wasn’t a complete pile of drivel. My intention was to help designers who are wondering whether or not they should purchase a retina Mac make an informed decision. Too many sources are currently listing either only the good or only the bad and I wanted to share all my thoughts and let you decide for yourself whether or not a retina Mac is right for you.

On that note, what do you think? If you haven’t purchased a computer with a retina-quality display yet, do you think you will any time soon? Why or why not? If you have, what do you think of it? Would you recommend it to others?

Comments & Discussion

37 Comments

  • http://adriansandu.com Adrian Sandu

    If price is not that much of an issue and you work mostly at the same location, you could try and get a 27″ Thunderbolt display as an external monitor and work your non-retina stuff on it.

    I know that it will be a long time till I’ll get a Retina computer, given the price this new stuff sells for. While I own no Apple product now, I am using a 13″ MacBook Pro from the office. At best, I might purchase a 13″ MBPro and a 27″ Thunderbolt display to complement it and wait for better times and lower prices before getting a Retina screen.

  • http://stephaniesuits.com Stephanie

    “Retina screen? More like retina burning screen.” Ha! Ha! Ha!
    Seriously though, great article! I’ve been curious about a lot of these points as Apple seems to be constantly raising the bar for what users expect out of their web experience in one way or another.
    Personally I’m going to be waiting for a lower price tag before investing in a retina screen, but it’s good to keep all your points in mind for our users, clients and peers who have already made the leap.

  • http://ntonio.de Antonio

    One more reason to consider using vector based graphics for everything that is not a photo. (Expect for tiny icons of course)

  • Tyler

    I have found Photoshop (CS6) to be pretty unusable unless I’m hooked up on a non-retina, external display. They haven’t updated the app for retina yet and all of the tools look pixelated like your Twitter screenshot, as does you canvas no matter what level of zoom you are at. You can’t really judge mockups when they are constantly blurry like this.

    Once they release an update, I think it will be nice for iOS design.

  • verpixelt

    I just bought a MBP 15″ a few months ago, so to buy the new retina one now wasnt a a choice. A few days after the new retina one came out i hated my self for buying the old one. After reading your well written post I’m fine with my self now. I mostly sit in front of my MBP and pushing pixels around in PS. So the issue u discribed would hurt me to much as the features it brings with it. As u said “Once we’re all on the same page, everything will be dramatically simplified.” On this I’ll take the easier road and will buy a retina one in 1-2 years. Thanks a lot for your review!!!!

  • http://www.neatlee.com Mike

    I didn’t even read the entire article, but I felt someone needed to say it: How can you say that Apple has historically set the mark for tech shifts? That’s absolutely wrong and completely nullifies everything else you have to say. RANT RANT RANT.

    Obviously just kidding – very interesting article. Nice to see someone post the bad with the good. As a web designer myself, I’d definitely agree with you when you say this will be one of the bigger hurdles the industry is going to have to face. Thanks for sharing.

  • Joshua Johnson

    Thanks for the feedback guys! Happy to see that this post has helped answer some questions.

  • http://friday-next.com Casey Friday

    I’m often buying new MacBooks to see which I like the best because I enjoy buying/reselling them. I’ve been working on a 17″ 2.3GHz antiglare machine lately but just found a slamming deal on the new rMBP.

    I bought it and have been testing it out for the past 2 days, and I don’t think I can break myself away. The 2lb weight loss and beautifully crisp 1920×1200 are more convincing than the lack of useable ports and 100% pixel agreement within apps.

    I don’t like that Ps isn’t retina-ready, but this laptop is so good that I’m willing to look past that now. If I get too tired of it, I’ll just sell it on ebay and move back to a 17″ MBP.

    Thanks for the article!

  • Rolando

    Great article! Anybody else having issues with the screenshots, they are not loading.

  • http://dia-better.org Max

    Thanks for sharing your experience. It was very helpful for me. I’ll wait with my purchasing, eventualy untill the axiotron.com (http://www.modbook.com/) will come out with a retina display.

  • http://dia-better.org Max

    this might be helpful for people who’d like to retinafy their website

    (http://mir.aculo.us/2012/06/26/flowchart-how-to-retinafy-your-website/)

  • Devy

    Apple Removes Green Electronics Certification From Products.

    Apple is Peace of Crap. And you need to look at that news : http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2012/07/06/apple-removes-green-electronics-certification-from-products/

    That’s why I am not buying any Apple because of ecology.

  • Legycsapo

    Oh come on people, one company’s marketing defines the whole design industry ??? We are like sheeps, or zombies in this thing. Apples “great” retina stuff is just about the WOW thing, so people are killing each other to buy one. Come on … this can’t be serious !
    So now everyone has to accommodate … hm…

  • Joshua Johnson

    THERE’S the comment I was waiting for :)

  • mike

    now to make the digital world better we need to work on retina screens we are the designers, technology is our job make things beautiful.

  • http://www.benhayes.com Ben Hayes

    Does a standard res graphic look worse on a MBP retina display than it does on a standard screen? Or is it just that it looks worse by comparison, seen side-by-side with the HDPI graphics?

    My understanding is that exact pixel doubling for non-HDPI images should render the image exactly the same as before, when seen on a retina display. For example, I think older iPad apps look (objectively) the same on the iPad3 as they do on the iPad2. But of course subjectively they will look worse because they are seen side-by-side with the ultra-crisp retina graphics around them. I think I can live with this. However, if you’re saying that the old graphics actually look (objectively) *worse* than they do on an older MBP, that would be something to worry about. For example if the upscaling causes some extra blurring for some reason.

  • Joshua Johnson

    Ben, it’s simply not a comparative issue. This applies to the iPad, iPhone and rMBP: non-retina apps look worse than they normally do on a non-retina screen. They have to. Pixel doubling tries its best, but you simply can’t add that much artificial information to an image and have it come out looking great.

    As I mentioned in the article, the reason these apps actually look worse is that the retina screen really is like taking a magnifying glass to their pixels, making them seem more jagged and pixelated. Older screens don’t highlight that level of detail and therefore present a more acceptable version of that app.

  • Julian Lloyd

    Ben, the simple answer is yes; non-optimized images on the retina screen look noticeably worse than on a traditional screen.

    Imagine that retina screens are taking images twice their normal size, and scaling them down; non-optimized images are effectively blown up twice their size; both images are occupying the same screen real estate (ie. same size on the screen), but the non-optimized images look horrendous (especially smaller/more detailed images).

    The logic that since it uses 4x more pixels it could just use 2 pixel thick lines instead of 1 pixel thick lines, I think would only apply if you were to use the retina-screen without the retina mode… or in other words, use the screen at an actual 2880×1800 instead of 1440×900-retinized—but that would effectively turn the retina screen into a normal display.

  • http://www.but.be Tom Goethals

    I was wondering the same thing as Ben Hayes above, if it’s just exact pixel doubling on retina (as it is now on iPad2->new iPad), why would (objectively) an image look worse on a retina device. a 1 pixel line would become a 2 pixel line, but should be equally sharp. as i understand it is not. why? (subjectively I understand it looks bad) imagine pixel art like this image (http://simoncpage.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/major_town_copy.png) if it would just double up each pixel, it should still look, well, pixelated :) but sharp, right?

  • http://rainbow-solutions.us Rick Lell

    As a web designer, I’ve solved the resolution problem by beginning my sites in Dreamweaver as a Blank Page > HTML5 > 1 column liquid centered layout.

    Now with ever increasing resolution and/or monitor dimensions, the remaining difficultly lies in creating cool background images. How big is too big? I have a 2000×1200 image on my personal site. This means very slow loading for those not blessed with lightning fast broad band connections.

    Do you settle for one pixel wide gradient images of untold length? 1800 pixels long now if you wish to accommodate the new retina screens, and where does it end? This is why all the “modern” sites have these single color backgrounds, or as is the norm now, with the header and footer done in a contrasting color, make the site two-tone. To me this is boring. Take a look at the background image on my site. A friend at twitter calls it “shockingly old-school” LOL.

    http://rainbow-solutions.us/

    So, where does it end? I’ve just bought an Acer 20″ LCD, TFT active matrix, CCFL monitor to go with my Acer AMD Quad-Core PC. It’s great and I’m totally satisfied with the wide-screen 1600×900 display.

    Bottom line…Apple is just one company. Most people are still using PCs. 89.2% vs. 10.8% market shares, this not counting the Linux people for obvious reasons of not being in the market at all and trying hard to stay off the grid completely…lol.

    OK…enough said. Peace

    • Jonas

      Dude, come on….just look at your ‘website’ WTF…
      “As a web designer, I’ve solved the resolution problem by beginning my sites in Dreamweaver as a Blank Page > HTML5 > 1 column liquid centered layout.”

      Dude, please…just shut your mouth.

    • Marc

      You have to be kidding…. (looks around) Right?

  • Iv

    An excellent review, thanks!

    It left me with a couple of questions – I’m fairly new to this and I’d be really, really grateful if you could help me out with some explanations.

    To put it simply, my situation is the following:
    The nature of my business makes me almost completely depend on my clients seeing the photos I upload or send being as close as possible to the original colour and sharpness seen on the monitor I edited them on. Small differences can have massive impact here – they can literally make or break a big investment.

    Would I be correct in assuming that pictures that were edited – optimized – on a retina screen wouldn’t suffer in sharpness when seen on other, lower resolution non-IPS screens?

    For a specific example, let’s say I edit and export a low-res photo ready for the web – say a 500x500px image. If it looks sharp on a retina it was edited on, will it look just as sharp on lower resolutions?

    Also… Is there a way of encoding colour profiles/exact colour coordinates into a picture, so as to make the colours appear equal on all screens? In essence, force a screen (through a browser) to show the colour that was seen on the one the picture was made on? Of course, allowing for different brightness settings.

    As said, I’m not that apt screen-wise and that’s something I’m working to change. So helping me out with this, if possible, would really be appreciated.

  • Joshua Fernau

    I’m just getting into design, but have been a Mac user for many years. So far my experience is very similar to this article. Slightly tough adjustment, headaches, trouble with third-party apps, etc., but like was said, ‘adapt or die’. It’s true, we either tread and sink or dive in and swim. Personally I love the rMBP. It’s simply an amazing technology and sleek design. Why wouldn’t you buy this over the others for the same price? If you are buying a lower end mac that isn’t as much money then I can see the hesitation/debate, but if it’s between the two 15″s (old vs new) it truly isn’t a choice that should be debated on for too long. Get the new tech, wait for most to catch up (won’t be too long), and enjoy the amazing machine in your hands.

  • Michal

    MBPro + Retina is simply a margin so “adapt or die” is a joke. Sure I can take retina display into consideration while designing a website but only when a client wants to pay extra.

  • http://games.webblocks.nl Rudie

    Wow, there’s really nothing practical in this article. Go newspaper fod! I was hoping for some useful tips… Stupid retina displays and iphone-4-loving-designer-nuts.

  • Jesika S

    ?Adapt or die? Hmmm. Some of us just simply cannot “adapt.” I’m in that small minority where my eyes (or brain) just cannot handle any of the MBP’s that are LED backlit…including Retina. I get migraine like headaches and awful motion sickness which leads to nausea. I’ve made countless adjustments and spent 100′s of hours researching my problem. I’ve come to the conclusion that I cannot handle LED backlit flat screens or laptops. I’m so bummed.

  • C

    I too took about two weeks going between my old ’07 MBP to my new retina MBP, and endured increased headaches and nausea. While I usually had my old one at full brightness because dimmer levels made it difficult to see, I now have to use it at dim levels and I possible limit my screen time. I’m looking into finding a tv monitor to use instead for some use. Many websites take a few seconds to focus or must refocus as I scroll and watching shows online also take a few minutes to focus clearly enough to view. But just as you said, looking back on anything older is like looking at dot-matrix printouts! ick. Jumping into the future is much preferred.

  • AntoxaGray

    Most designers are unaware that retina screens exist.

  • http://percydesign.com percy chow

    To be frank, I think think is an instance where the tool needs to match the need, objective, etc.

    Using a retina display, is like using binoculars versus glasses to read.

    The original intent (I ASSUME) of the retina display was to allow as crisp of a viewing experience on small mobile screens. And that use case makes A LOT of sense, as the 3.5″ screen experience was truly painful. However, as you move UP screen sizes, where your viewable distance is over 1 foot, sharpness isn’t as much of an issue.

    I ASSUME someone at Apple, got the idea, that since the retina screen looks SO nice on a mobile screen, it’s GOT TO LOOK as good on a notebook screen right?

    And for the autocad guys, the guys who do retouch work, anyone who deals in detail… that extra pixel piece of detail makes the difference between working in 800% of size, or 200% of size. So it’s awesome yes?

    But the thing is… a vast portion of the internet experience isn’t just looking at photos or text… it’s… scanning information… and doing it fast.

    So the need for 200ppi+ imagery can be kinda moot when devices range from 72pixels to 300+ppi because you’ll never hit ALL the resolution ranges with one solution, but rather, several.

    And given the rest of the world still operates at 72ppi… and complains about mobile bandwidth, serving up retina-optimized imagery at 200-300ppi… well… put it this way… imagine your 3G/4G/LTE websites loading 300%-400% SLOWER.

    And although retina iPads are selling well, retina MacBooks are not compared to the rest of the internet browsing and building world.

    • http://about.me/escapist jason

      Trust me, once you spend an afternoon reading text on a retina display, you’ll never want to go back. It’s as crisp as you could hope for, not to mention brighter and improved color balance.

      That said, I sort of wish I hadn’t gotten one. I’m a designer and while the consumption experience is unfuckingbelievable on a MBP Retina, the process of creating for non-retina screens is… challenging. Having a non-retina external monitor solves some of the problems, but not as many as I’d anticipated.

  • Bryan

    I know this write up is a bit old now but as a mbpr user I thought I’d throw my 2 cents into the conversation. While I cannot comment on the use of non-retina optimized programs such as photoshop for making web based images, as a photographer, dealing with very large image files and editing them I’ve run into no problems through the entire process up to and including printing the images. Having unoptimized buttons to click on really doesn’t hamper my work, and for the time being its a small price to pay for such a beautiful machine. Overall I’m entirely happy with the mbpr, although I do refuse to upgrade to mountain lion until the issues with it are worked out. Great article btw.

  • Adam

    Photoshop CS6 is driving me crazy. I think the questions that this article poses are best asked of photoshop IF CS6 WERE RETINA OPTIMIZED. But it’s not, so it’s a total heap of shit when trying to view things at natural resolution. I haven’t had troubles for the last couple of hours whilst slicing a mock, but that’s because I spend more than half the time past 400% zoom anyway (where photoshop does that obnoxious pixel grid shit that makes me want to punch babies, but that’s another discussion). Also: what is this compass shit that happens all the time? Oh, you mean that there’s a touch-based rotate feature with no way to get it back to exactly 0 degrees unless i close and reopen the document, and that I can’t actually disable the feature unless I disable all gestures on my computer and/or Photoshop? Great thinking.

    Needless to say, these are ALL 100% ADOBE COMPLAINTS (as usual), and have nothing to do with the retina display. I am very much in love with this display as well, even though it has its frustrations.

    • http://rorymorris.co.uk Rory

      @Adam

      You can turn off the annoying as hell pixel grid by hitting:

      View -> Show -> Pixel Grid

  • http://about.me/escapist jason

    Personally, I’m having a really hard time designing non-retina assets on a retina display. It’s clear I’ll need to adjust my workflow, but not quite clear how.

  • David

    Hi, is it possibly to see everything clearly and without the need of using another monitor if i put the resolution on 2880×1800? I’ve read that photoshop does work well and without pixel problems on this resolution, can someone confirm this?? thanks!!

Subscribe
Membership
About the Author